Readers, there is something that has been weighing heavily on my conscience for a long while now, and I think it's time I finally came clean:
*ahem*
Chainmail is just called mail! Studded leather armor doesn't exist! Longswords and greatswords are the same thing; what you call a longsword is actually an arming sword!
Whew, glad to get that off my chest. Now let me explain...
As an avid tabletop fantasy RPG player and a bona fide medievalist, I often find myself torn between two worlds. On the one hand, I know that the magical and imaginative world(s) of Dungeons & Dragons and Pathfinder are not - and should never be - accurate simulations of the medieval world that they imitate, if only for the fact that magic and dragons and orcs never existed. On the other hand, I know that the key to good worldbuilding is to ground your world to some extent in reality, and for me the best way to do that is to use what I know of medieval history as a foundation to build upon. Since I literally know more about medieval history than 99% of the population (even if I am toward the bottom of that 1%), I sometimes come across pieces of the game - be they rules, items, lore, or what-have-you - that strike me as, for lack of a better term,
innacurate. I sometimes find it difficult to take off my historian hat and put on my fantasy hat. Can't I just mash them together into some sort of awesome new hat?
|
This baby would have really helped me study for my Latin final |
History is not fantasy, and fantasy is not history. But that doesn't mean that the two are mutually exclusive.* No one thinks the events of
Game of Thrones are actual historical events (at least I hope they don't), yet it frequently becomes a point on which medievalists and the general public engage with each other about actual medieval history. No spoilers, but toward the end of Season 5 of the show, an
event happened which ignited much debate across the internet, including much discussion about whether the
event in question was historically accurate. This - again - despite the fact that
Game of Thrones is a fictional story set in a fantasy world that no one believes is real. Why? Because actual medieval history informs
Game of Thrones and - to a much greater extent -
A Song of Ice and Fire, and that worldbuilding foundation makes George "Reading Rainbow" Martin's fictional world so much more compelling than, say, Generic Fantasy World 27B1X.
A Song of Ice and Fire is, at some level, a meditation on the nature of power, so it makes sense to set it in a world of feudal obligation where a ruler's ability to garner support is dependent on his personal relationships and his attempts to please his barons. This sort of 'realistic' fantasy, set in a world that owes more to the Middle Ages than to Middle Earth, has really struck a chord with people, and as a fan of both fantasy and medieval history, I couldn't be happier.